When Ego Leads: Working with an Insecure Principal
If you have ever worked under a principal who micromanages
everything, takes credit for others' work, or seems easily threatened by
confident teachers then you may have experienced the insecure principal.
This leadership type does not always come with loud demands
or explosive tempers. Sometimes, the signs are more subtle; frequent policy
changes without consultation, resistance to teacher-led initiatives, or quick
defensiveness when feedback is offered.
From my experience in the classroom, insecure principals
often fall somewhere between the authoritarian and transactional leadership
styles. They rely heavily on rigid systems, enforce top-down decisions, and
focus on control, not necessarily because it is effective, but because it keeps
them feeling in charge.
What It Looks Like on the Ground
Working with an insecure leader feels like walking on
eggshells. You may second-guess your tone in emails, overthink your wording
during meetings, or avoid sharing ideas that could be misinterpreted as showing
them up.
Here are some signs I have personally observed:
- They dominate meetings, not to lead, but to assert.
- They downplay staff suggestions, unless it was their idea first.
- They take mistakes personally, turning minor issues into major offenses.
- They praise selectively, mostly toward those who do not “outshine” them.
- They resist change, especially when it comes from below.
- They may rely on a small group of loyal allies to make decisions behind closed doors, creating confusion, resentment, and division among staff.
This is not always done maliciously. Sometimes it stems from a deep discomfort
with not having all the answers, or a fear of being seen as less capable than
the staff they lead.
The Role of Ego
At the core of insecure leadership is ego. not confidence,
but fragile pride. When every question feels like a challenge and every teacher
success feels like a threat, leadership becomes about self-preservation instead
of school improvement.
That kind of leadership is not just frustrating, it is
harmful. It creates a culture where innovation dies quietly, collaboration is
cautious, and morale slowly disappears.
Why It Matters
Strong teachers do not want to "take over", they want to contribute meaningfully. But
insecure principals often perceive confident educators as competition rather
than allies. In the end, students lose out because the staff is too busy
managing egos instead of focusing on growth.
And let us be clear: insecurity at the top trickles down. It
stifles trust, delays progress, and pushes passionate educators into silence or
burnout.
What Teachers Wish These Principals Knew
- We are on the same team. A teacher’s strength is not your weakness.
- Control does not equal leadership. Listening builds more loyalty than commanding.
- It is okay not to know everything. Vulnerability makes space for growth, for everyone.
Final Thought
Insecurity is not a crime. It is human. But when it drives
leadership decisions, it hurts schools. Teachers do not need perfect
principals. We need ones who are secure enough to lead with humility, strong
enough to let others shine, and wise enough to know they do not need to have all
the answers, but rather the courage to listen.
Have you worked with a principal who micromanages everything, takes credit for others' work, or seems easily threatened by confident teachers? How did it impact your teaching experience?
Tell us your story in the comments.
Comments
Post a Comment